rocketman wrote:
What exactly was so fresh and new about what you guys did in the mid-90's?
The fact that you could tune into KLSU virtually any minute of the day and hear great music that no one else would touch. In 1993-94, Mariah Carey, Whitney Houston and Boys II Men were cutting edge for Baton Rouge. A whole generation of people were being ignored.
rocketman wrote:
I used to listen every now and then (as long as I could stomach it) and KLSU sounded exactly like every other commercial "alternative" station out there. The range of music played was VERY narrow when compared with the KLSU from the mid-80's... with a few exceptions (such as specialty shows, like "Saturated Neighborhood", which Jenni used to do in fact) you guys never seemed to stray far away from the CMJ Top 40.
We were far broader than the 200 records that most commerical stations played. We never adhered to CMJ, we did our own thing. The station now lives and dies by what's going on in "indie rock" circles. We did our best to find out what our fellow students wanted to hear, its as simple as that.
rocketman wrote:
I don't know if this next part is correct, but I had heard that your KLSU only allowed journalism majors to work there
Untrue. Unlike the previous capo regieme which did not have one journalism major on the air, we simply opened the door and were fair. My major: history (admittedly with a broadcast minor.)
rocketman wrote:
- and that the song list was PROGRAMMED (LOL!!) by the music director or some other station exec. If these are true, then... wow, it sure would explain a lot.
Guilty as charged. I'll be the first to admit it. We were all about taking the tools that were out there and using them to create something new. Not a heavy-rotation CHR station but a broad yet balanced mix. Certainly not the 90 times a week that a station like WFMF would play its top records.
If you wanted amateur, anything can get played radio then we were not for you. Sorry. As I stated in my previous post, we didn't want that 1960's aesthetic because a.) it meant nothing to our generation; and b.) we knew that short attention spans afflict most college students, the primary audience for KLSU. And nobody, and I do mean nobody, wanted to stop "the rock" for a jazz set that would drive folks away faster than you can say "hey, give me my Radiohead CD."
rocketman wrote:
If the DJ's don't have the freedom to play what they want, then you get a carbon copy show every few hours. Not imaginative, and not at all interesting.
If you think Blur into Tom Waits into the Ramones into Beck is stylistically limited, then I'm sorry, we just aren't broad enough for you.
rocketman wrote:
to be honest, the announcers I heard during that time sounded pretty good (although WAY TOO commercial-sounding for a college radio station).
We trained them in what little we knew. No liner cards, nothing like that. We even brought in WPRG's own Lois Lane to give the females on the staff a role model. If the point of the station was educational, there's nobody better in Baton Rouge to serve as an example of what can be accomplished in a communications career. KLSU was a means to another end, not an end itself. We wanted a career as fun as KLSU but we also wanted to graduate.
rocketman wrote:
And then there was the UNFORGIVABLE fact that some dipshit decided to throw out the incredible music collection we had worked so hard to create - without thinking the station might again want those CDs and LPs at some point in the future (which, in fact, they would love them all back now).
That, I must adamantly assert, is a lie. It has been passed along on this board as fact and that is not so. We kept it all. The great purge happened closer to 1999 from what I can gather, and I was gone almost half a decade earlier. We still played CD's and LP's; today's KLSU does not. According to a friend in the production department, they will regularly delete song files deemed "too old."
I hate to admit it, but this accusation really chaps my ass because when I started @ KLSU in 1992, the biggest problem we had was theft of music by people who worked at the station. It was so rampant, at one point there was a large poster on the wall where you could write down titles of missing CD's. In a week's time, no white space was left on the poster. I even managed to make peace with The Compact Disc Store - someone in the early 1990s soured KLSU on them - and we were able to replace a huge chunk of the missing CD library via underwriting mentions on the station.
By the way, after we changed direction the theft stopped completely. I am told that it hasn't been that big of a problem since then.
rocketman wrote:
So, it's more or less like Scott said - "My dog is better than your dog". Basically, the ONLY people here who actually think that KLSU sounded better in the mid-90's was the three of you (unless you contact more of your buddies to get over here to defend you), and the rest of us disagree.
The only judges we cared about were the 25,000 students who paid for KLSU's service. Knowing that this is your sandbox doesn't surprise me either, but it was my two buddies who actually injected some life into these proceedings.
rocketman wrote:
Honestly, though, which sounded better was simply a matter of personal preference. I will admit that. But I do completely disagree that what you guys did was "fresh" and "new", because there were many stations all over the country (most of them commercial) doing that already.
In 1993, there were only 13 commercial alternative stations in the United States, only one in Lousiana and it had just turned on at the time. If what we were doing wasn't new, there would have been no way for us to hear about it. And even if there were, so what? It's not our job to survey the whole country and say "oh, someone is doing that so we'd better stick to the same old lazy aesthetic its always been." We felt there was a revolution happening in music that finally displaced hair bands and other crass product, one that reflected our generation. We decided to be a part of it. As I said, it was our time.
Just for the record, what would you define as fresh and new? My guess is that's its something akin to KLSU/WPRG. You can't expect me and my peers to continue to do the kind of radio you hold dear, just like you can't expect musicians of today to play stuff that sounds like 1967. I don't expect LSU students born in 1987 - the year in which most incoming freshmen were born - to make a radio station that sounds like WPRG. That's not fair to them and it would make us all hypocrites. They have to do their own thing just like we did our own thing and you guys did your own thing. If we say "ah, those kids they don't know radio" then we begin to sound like our parents. Or Marc Cohn.
rocketman wrote:
And the fact that KLSU has mostly reverted back to a free form sound indicates that the experiment didn't last.
Not true. They are as formatted as we were. According to my same source, they are locked into that CMJ chart. But it's their station, not mine and not yours. If they don't engage their fellow students, they will fail.
rocketman wrote:
I'm sure you guys will post rebuttals to this, be my guest - I know I'm not going to convince you three (or your friends) of my side, and you sure as hell aren't going to change my mind!
I'm not planning to read this thread anymore anyway (I've said my 2 cents). Still, it is nice to have you here... it's created quite a bit of activity for Scott's site, and I am really glad to see that.
-barry
At least its civil. I am not happy about the things that have been attributed to me on this board but like everything else I don't let it get me down. We saved KLSU from being turned off; I sleep well at night knowing we didn't only survive, we thrived. We may be seen as the Jean Doumanians of KLSU by you guys, but our peers thought otherwise.